<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogrush isn’t a Pyramid Scheme it’s a Ponzi Scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=blogrush-isn%25e2%2580%2599t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%25e2%2580%2599s-a-ponzi-scheme</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO 2.0 &#124; 7 Reasons Why CLIQ Is the Better Blogrush</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO 2.0 &#124; 7 Reasons Why CLIQ Is the Better Blogrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] no scam, scheme, no pyramid or ponzi involved, no strings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no scam, scheme, no pyramid or ponzi involved, no strings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO 2.0 &#124; 7 Reasons Why CLIQ Is the Better Blogrush</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO 2.0 &#124; 7 Reasons Why CLIQ Is the Better Blogrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-795</guid>
		<description>[...] no scam, scheme, no pyramid or ponzi involved, no strings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no scam, scheme, no pyramid or ponzi involved, no strings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Like all good things on the internet... This may well be a passing fad. However, since it does not involve a monetary commitment what&#039;s the harm. If all it ever become is a market source for second tier blogs... Is that a bad thing.

I am putting it on my blog to increase traffic. This blog is in a niche catagory, house cleaning tips... Now, it is #1 ranked with Google for six related searches, but the blog only gets around 1500 hits a month. I work to increase traffic daily... So for me this seems like a viable option...

If it is only temporary.... That&#039;s ok, because the information is useful many visitor place the blog in favorites. Thus ensuring steady traffic.

Since Google has no opinion yet, I am moving forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like all good things on the internet&#8230; This may well be a passing fad. However, since it does not involve a monetary commitment what&#8217;s the harm. If all it ever become is a market source for second tier blogs&#8230; Is that a bad thing.</p>
<p>I am putting it on my blog to increase traffic. This blog is in a niche catagory, house cleaning tips&#8230; Now, it is #1 ranked with Google for six related searches, but the blog only gets around 1500 hits a month. I work to increase traffic daily&#8230; So for me this seems like a viable option&#8230;</p>
<p>If it is only temporary&#8230;. That&#8217;s ok, because the information is useful many visitor place the blog in favorites. Thus ensuring steady traffic.</p>
<p>Since Google has no opinion yet, I am moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Like all good things on the internet... This may well be a passing fad. However, since it does not involve a monetary commitment what&#039;s the harm. If all it ever become is a market source for second tier blogs... Is that a bad thing.

I am putting it on my blog to increase traffic. This blog is in a niche catagory, house cleaning tips... Now, it is #1 ranked with Google for six related searches, but the blog only gets around 1500 hits a month. I work to increase traffic daily... So for me this seems like a viable option...

If it is only temporary.... That&#039;s ok, because the information is useful many visitor place the blog in favorites. Thus ensuring steady traffic.

Since Google has no opinion yet, I am moving forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like all good things on the internet&#8230; This may well be a passing fad. However, since it does not involve a monetary commitment what&#8217;s the harm. If all it ever become is a market source for second tier blogs&#8230; Is that a bad thing.</p>
<p>I am putting it on my blog to increase traffic. This blog is in a niche catagory, house cleaning tips&#8230; Now, it is #1 ranked with Google for six related searches, but the blog only gets around 1500 hits a month. I work to increase traffic daily&#8230; So for me this seems like a viable option&#8230;</p>
<p>If it is only temporary&#8230;. That&#8217;s ok, because the information is useful many visitor place the blog in favorites. Thus ensuring steady traffic.</p>
<p>Since Google has no opinion yet, I am moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRush Getting The Press It Deserves - Internet Marketing Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRush Getting The Press It Deserves - Internet Marketing Sucks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogrush isn’t a Pyramid Scheme it’s a Ponzi Scheme [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogrush isn’t a Pyramid Scheme it’s a Ponzi Scheme [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRush Getting The Press It Deserves - Internet Marketing Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRush Getting The Press It Deserves - Internet Marketing Sucks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-788</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogrush isn’t a Pyramid Scheme it’s a Ponzi Scheme [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogrush isn’t a Pyramid Scheme it’s a Ponzi Scheme [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-137</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an excellent point Kelvin. And I most certainly agree with that. I just wanted to clarify what a Ponzi truly is since there&#039;s so much confusion on the Web about them and pyramids. ;)

Shine on,
Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an excellent point Kelvin. And I most certainly agree with that. I just wanted to clarify what a Ponzi truly is since there&#8217;s so much confusion on the Web about them and pyramids. <img src='http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Shine on,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-789</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an excellent point Kelvin. And I most certainly agree with that. I just wanted to clarify what a Ponzi truly is since there&#039;s so much confusion on the Web about them and pyramids. ;)

Shine on,
Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an excellent point Kelvin. And I most certainly agree with that. I just wanted to clarify what a Ponzi truly is since there&#8217;s so much confusion on the Web about them and pyramids. <img src='http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Shine on,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on whether you think the real estate on your site has a value

Could you make money from adsense in the area used by blogrush?
If it featured details of your RSS would it increase the number of subscribers?

You are right it isn&#039;t a true Ponzi scheme but I think it relies on the hub</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on whether you think the real estate on your site has a value</p>
<p>Could you make money from adsense in the area used by blogrush?<br />
If it featured details of your RSS would it increase the number of subscribers?</p>
<p>You are right it isn&#8217;t a true Ponzi scheme but I think it relies on the hub</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-790</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on whether you think the real estate on your site has a value

Could you make money from adsense in the area used by blogrush?
If it featured details of your RSS would it increase the number of subscribers?

You are right it isn&#039;t a true Ponzi scheme but I think it relies on the hub</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on whether you think the real estate on your site has a value</p>
<p>Could you make money from adsense in the area used by blogrush?<br />
If it featured details of your RSS would it increase the number of subscribers?</p>
<p>You are right it isn&#8217;t a true Ponzi scheme but I think it relies on the hub</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-139</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna have to disagree with this based on what a Ponzi scheme actually is. Just like a pyramid scheme, a Ponzi scheme requires a monetary investment. A Ponzi, by definition, is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying returns to investors out of the money raised from subsequent investors, rather than from the profits generated by any &quot;real&quot; business.

A Ponzi offers high short-term returns in order to entice new investors whose &quot;money&quot; is needed to fund payouts to earlier investors and to lure its victims into even bigger risks. Since there&#039;s no money exchanging hands, BR cannot be classified as a Ponzi or a as pyramid scheme. Both require monetary investment up front. Yes, BR is pyramidical in structure, but it is not a pyramid &quot;scheme&quot;.

What essentially differentiates a Ponzi from a pyramid is that in a Ponzi, the schemer acts as a “hub” for the victims and interacts with them directly. In a pyramid scheme, those who recruit additional participants benefit directly, and failure to recruit typically means no investment return at all.

Anyway, really nice blog here. I&#039;m glad I happened across it.

Shine on,
Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna have to disagree with this based on what a Ponzi scheme actually is. Just like a pyramid scheme, a Ponzi scheme requires a monetary investment. A Ponzi, by definition, is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying returns to investors out of the money raised from subsequent investors, rather than from the profits generated by any &#8220;real&#8221; business.</p>
<p>A Ponzi offers high short-term returns in order to entice new investors whose &#8220;money&#8221; is needed to fund payouts to earlier investors and to lure its victims into even bigger risks. Since there&#8217;s no money exchanging hands, BR cannot be classified as a Ponzi or a as pyramid scheme. Both require monetary investment up front. Yes, BR is pyramidical in structure, but it is not a pyramid &#8220;scheme&#8221;.</p>
<p>What essentially differentiates a Ponzi from a pyramid is that in a Ponzi, the schemer acts as a “hub” for the victims and interacts with them directly. In a pyramid scheme, those who recruit additional participants benefit directly, and failure to recruit typically means no investment return at all.</p>
<p>Anyway, really nice blog here. I&#8217;m glad I happened across it.</p>
<p>Shine on,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-791</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna have to disagree with this based on what a Ponzi scheme actually is. Just like a pyramid scheme, a Ponzi scheme requires a monetary investment. A Ponzi, by definition, is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying returns to investors out of the money raised from subsequent investors, rather than from the profits generated by any &quot;real&quot; business.

A Ponzi offers high short-term returns in order to entice new investors whose &quot;money&quot; is needed to fund payouts to earlier investors and to lure its victims into even bigger risks. Since there&#039;s no money exchanging hands, BR cannot be classified as a Ponzi or a as pyramid scheme. Both require monetary investment up front. Yes, BR is pyramidical in structure, but it is not a pyramid &quot;scheme&quot;.

What essentially differentiates a Ponzi from a pyramid is that in a Ponzi, the schemer acts as a “hub” for the victims and interacts with them directly. In a pyramid scheme, those who recruit additional participants benefit directly, and failure to recruit typically means no investment return at all.

Anyway, really nice blog here. I&#039;m glad I happened across it.

Shine on,
Aaron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna have to disagree with this based on what a Ponzi scheme actually is. Just like a pyramid scheme, a Ponzi scheme requires a monetary investment. A Ponzi, by definition, is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying returns to investors out of the money raised from subsequent investors, rather than from the profits generated by any &#8220;real&#8221; business.</p>
<p>A Ponzi offers high short-term returns in order to entice new investors whose &#8220;money&#8221; is needed to fund payouts to earlier investors and to lure its victims into even bigger risks. Since there&#8217;s no money exchanging hands, BR cannot be classified as a Ponzi or a as pyramid scheme. Both require monetary investment up front. Yes, BR is pyramidical in structure, but it is not a pyramid &#8220;scheme&#8221;.</p>
<p>What essentially differentiates a Ponzi from a pyramid is that in a Ponzi, the schemer acts as a “hub” for the victims and interacts with them directly. In a pyramid scheme, those who recruit additional participants benefit directly, and failure to recruit typically means no investment return at all.</p>
<p>Anyway, really nice blog here. I&#8217;m glad I happened across it.</p>
<p>Shine on,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I agree Symbian, it&#039;ll stagger on for a while but once the good people jump ship it&#039;ll just be a banner exchange for second rate blogs.

Plus they&#039;ll know exactly how many page impression&#039;s you&#039;ve got. From what I understand the owner of BlogRush has his own network of niche sites. Interesting coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Symbian, it&#8217;ll stagger on for a while but once the good people jump ship it&#8217;ll just be a banner exchange for second rate blogs.</p>
<p>Plus they&#8217;ll know exactly how many page impression&#8217;s you&#8217;ve got. From what I understand the owner of BlogRush has his own network of niche sites. Interesting coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-794</guid>
		<description>I agree Symbian, it&#039;ll stagger on for a while but once the good people jump ship it&#039;ll just be a banner exchange for second rate blogs.

Plus they&#039;ll know exactly how many page impression&#039;s you&#039;ve got. From what I understand the owner of BlogRush has his own network of niche sites. Interesting coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Symbian, it&#8217;ll stagger on for a while but once the good people jump ship it&#8217;ll just be a banner exchange for second rate blogs.</p>
<p>Plus they&#8217;ll know exactly how many page impression&#8217;s you&#8217;ve got. From what I understand the owner of BlogRush has his own network of niche sites. Interesting coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbian</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Thanks for explanation of the scheme. I think the lower &#039;crowd&#039; of bloggers in this scheme doesn&#039;t even know that &quot;...value of the traffic blogrush sends is worth less than the advertising for other they provide&quot;. So it is possible that BlogRush will survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for explanation of the scheme. I think the lower &#8216;crowd&#8217; of bloggers in this scheme doesn&#8217;t even know that &#8220;&#8230;value of the traffic blogrush sends is worth less than the advertising for other they provide&#8221;. So it is possible that BlogRush will survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbian</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Thanks for explanation of the scheme. I think the lower &#039;crowd&#039; of bloggers in this scheme doesn&#039;t even know that &quot;...value of the traffic blogrush sends is worth less than the advertising for other they provide&quot;. So it is possible that BlogRush will survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for explanation of the scheme. I think the lower &#8216;crowd&#8217; of bloggers in this scheme doesn&#8217;t even know that &#8220;&#8230;value of the traffic blogrush sends is worth less than the advertising for other they provide&#8221;. So it is possible that BlogRush will survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaymentBlogger &#187; The ancient Egyptians didn&#8217;t rush around but they still built pyramids</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>PaymentBlogger &#187; The ancient Egyptians didn&#8217;t rush around but they still built pyramids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] money up front or in this case links but you just being semantic, apparently rather then pyramid its a Ponzi scheme. Which is just like a pyramid scheme in the way referrals build up like a pyramid but not a pyramid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] money up front or in this case links but you just being semantic, apparently rather then pyramid its a Ponzi scheme. Which is just like a pyramid scheme in the way referrals build up like a pyramid but not a pyramid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaymentBlogger &#187; The ancient Egyptians didn&#8217;t rush around but they still built pyramids</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>PaymentBlogger &#187; The ancient Egyptians didn&#8217;t rush around but they still built pyramids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-792</guid>
		<description>[...] money up front or in this case links but you just being semantic, apparently rather then pyramid its a Ponzi scheme. Which is just like a pyramid scheme in the way referrals build up like a pyramid but not a pyramid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] money up front or in this case links but you just being semantic, apparently rather then pyramid its a Ponzi scheme. Which is just like a pyramid scheme in the way referrals build up like a pyramid but not a pyramid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Street</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up. :)

&quot;as it will require an ever increasing number of page impressions and widget users to deliver the traffic they promise.&quot;

Actually I don&#039;t think this is the case.  I think they have enough &#039;headline slots&#039; to fulfil their promises even in the incredibly unlikely event that 10 tiers of referrals become common.  In the far more likely situation where referrals don&#039;t routinely reach 10 tiers they&#039;ll have plenty of slots available in every widget to sell advertising.

With click trough rates of 0.05% (prelim results from problogger) neither the average user nor the advertiser is going to see much benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up. <img src='http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;as it will require an ever increasing number of page impressions and widget users to deliver the traffic they promise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually I don&#8217;t think this is the case.  I think they have enough &#8216;headline slots&#8217; to fulfil their promises even in the incredibly unlikely event that 10 tiers of referrals become common.  In the far more likely situation where referrals don&#8217;t routinely reach 10 tiers they&#8217;ll have plenty of slots available in every widget to sell advertising.</p>
<p>With click trough rates of 0.05% (prelim results from problogger) neither the average user nor the advertiser is going to see much benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Street</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2007/09/19/blogrush-isn%e2%80%99t-a-pyramid-scheme-it%e2%80%99s-a-ponzi-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=77#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up. :)

&quot;as it will require an ever increasing number of page impressions and widget users to deliver the traffic they promise.&quot;

Actually I don&#039;t think this is the case.  I think they have enough &#039;headline slots&#039; to fulfil their promises even in the incredibly unlikely event that 10 tiers of referrals become common.  In the far more likely situation where referrals don&#039;t routinely reach 10 tiers they&#039;ll have plenty of slots available in every widget to sell advertising.

With click trough rates of 0.05% (prelim results from problogger) neither the average user nor the advertiser is going to see much benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up. <img src='http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;as it will require an ever increasing number of page impressions and widget users to deliver the traffic they promise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually I don&#8217;t think this is the case.  I think they have enough &#8216;headline slots&#8217; to fulfil their promises even in the incredibly unlikely event that 10 tiers of referrals become common.  In the far more likely situation where referrals don&#8217;t routinely reach 10 tiers they&#8217;ll have plenty of slots available in every widget to sell advertising.</p>
<p>With click trough rates of 0.05% (prelim results from problogger) neither the average user nor the advertiser is going to see much benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

