<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monsters versus Aliens SEO Strategy – Stupidity or Genius?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%25e2%2580%2593-stupidity-or-genius</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=283#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>nerd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nerd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MVA &#124; Think Search</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>MVA &#124; Think Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=283#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>[...] 08.04.09 Andrew Girdwood spotted this a few days before I did and Site Visibility echo chambered it yesterday as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 08.04.09 Andrew Girdwood spotted this a few days before I did and Site Visibility echo chambered it yesterday as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lokku Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Lokku Labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=283#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Agree with all.

If this is a case of ignorance instead of stupidity, well, it&#039;s up to us Internet marketers to educate the market!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with all.</p>
<p>If this is a case of ignorance instead of stupidity, well, it&#8217;s up to us Internet marketers to educate the market!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=283#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ruben, and a good point.

What seems silly is that Paramount&#039;s &quot;sales cost&quot; could easily be pushed up by other PPC bidders for the term &#039;mva&#039; though. If others started bidding Paramount would either pay more and more for the top spot or start to drop down the rankings.

I think it&#039;s useful to see SEO as an investment, but considering the site ranks top in organic search for &quot;monsters versus aliens&quot; already, I don&#039;t see the need to promote the film with an ambiguous acronym for a search keyword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ruben, and a good point.</p>
<p>What seems silly is that Paramount&#8217;s &#8220;sales cost&#8221; could easily be pushed up by other PPC bidders for the term &#8216;mva&#8217; though. If others started bidding Paramount would either pay more and more for the top spot or start to drop down the rankings.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s useful to see SEO as an investment, but considering the site ranks top in organic search for &#8220;monsters versus aliens&#8221; already, I don&#8217;t see the need to promote the film with an ambiguous acronym for a search keyword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lokku Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/07/monsters-versus-aliens-seo-strategy-%e2%80%93-stupidity-or-genius/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>Lokku Labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=283#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>Maybe it is not that stupid, it depends how you look at it probably.

The ROI of a high budget movie is determined in the first weekend of exhibition. The offline advert directing traffic to the adwords campaign is just a sales cost.

SEO is more of an investment than a cost. Optimizing a microsite whose lifetime would be as long as the duration of the offline campaign would not benefit Paramount in the long term?

Ruben
Lokku Labs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it is not that stupid, it depends how you look at it probably.</p>
<p>The ROI of a high budget movie is determined in the first weekend of exhibition. The offline advert directing traffic to the adwords campaign is just a sales cost.</p>
<p>SEO is more of an investment than a cost. Optimizing a microsite whose lifetime would be as long as the duration of the offline campaign would not benefit Paramount in the long term?</p>
<p>Ruben<br />
Lokku Labs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

