<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What happened to GoCompare? – Their Banning, Penalty &amp; Re-inclusion into Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-happened-to-gocompare-%25e2%2580%2593-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guaranteed Website Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/comment-page-1/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Guaranteed Website Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=304#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Guaranteed Website Traffic...&lt;/strong&gt;

Great post thanks. Well written and precise. I will bokmark this one for a re-visit....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Guaranteed Website Traffic&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Great post thanks. Well written and precise. I will bokmark this one for a re-visit&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=304#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Nice and cynical!

I doubt that&#039;s the case but sure if they getting near month end and no where near their adwords targets, making a few big brands pay through the nose for branded traffic might massage the numbers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and cynical!</p>
<p>I doubt that&#8217;s the case but sure if they getting near month end and no where near their adwords targets, making a few big brands pay through the nose for branded traffic might massage the numbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Green Ape</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Green Ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=304#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Their reinclusion also corresponded with a massive increase in their PPC budget in Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their reinclusion also corresponded with a massive increase in their PPC budget in Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=304#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>There was a lot of speculation at the time, myself included, and an interesting fall-out of the speculation was the &quot;content for links&quot; debate on insiders view between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/contentnow-coop-network/00472#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;King and Kieron at Content CoOp&lt;/a&gt;

Reading between the lines of Kieron&#039;s post it looks like GoCompare just had on-site SEO issues which caused the drop - the redesign included a &quot;&gt;&gt;GOCOMPARE - OFFICAL SITE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot of speculation at the time, myself included, and an interesting fall-out of the speculation was the &#8220;content for links&#8221; debate on insiders view between <a href="http://www.insiders-view.co.uk/contentnow-coop-network/00472#comments" rel="nofollow">King and Kieron at Content CoOp</a></p>
<p>Reading between the lines of Kieron&#8217;s post it looks like GoCompare just had on-site SEO issues which caused the drop &#8211; the redesign included a &#8220;&gt;&gt;GOCOMPARE &#8211; OFFICAL SITE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanderings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Things I&#8217;ve liked: April 22nd</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>meanderings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Things I&#8217;ve liked: April 22nd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=304#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>[...] What happened to GoCompare? &#8211; Their Banning, Penalty &amp; Re-inclusion into Google - &quot;The manual spam report is very powerful - if the link building tactic was responsible for GoCompare&#8217;s problems it can highlight the ability of webmasters to report websites as spam. &quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What happened to GoCompare? &ndash; Their Banning, Penalty &amp; Re-inclusion into Google &#8211; &quot;The manual spam report is very powerful &#8211; if the link building tactic was responsible for GoCompare&rsquo;s problems it can highlight the ability of webmasters to report websites as spam. &quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2009/04/27/what-happened-to-gocompare-%e2%80%93-their-banning-penalty-re-inclusion-into-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/?p=304#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>Great Post Kelvin, been a lot said about this over the last week and after reading this i hope it will get put to bed. pretty much spot on in your reading of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post Kelvin, been a lot said about this over the last week and after reading this i hope it will get put to bed. pretty much spot on in your reading of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

