<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Reasons Every e-Commerce Manager Should use the Rel Canonical Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarking Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarking Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/?p=1000545#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>Sweet post! Probably one of the best on the canonical that I have seen. 

In my post:
http://brent.rangen.net/?p=304

I talk about using the Canonical and how Bing does not support it. Wouldn&#039;t you say to stick with a 301-redirect and the &quot;noindex&quot; until there total Search Engine support? 

Also,  when you are dealing with a huge ecommerce site on different country code domains, what would you personally do for the products as they are identical over four-five sites. The canonical attribute seems like the ideal choice, but if Bing doesn&#039;t recognize it, will your site be less visible through Bing? 

Love to hear your two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet post! Probably one of the best on the canonical that I have seen. </p>
<p>In my post:<br />
<a href="http://brent.rangen.net/?p=304">http://brent.rangen.net/?p=304</a></p>
<p>I talk about using the Canonical and how Bing does not support it. Wouldn&#8217;t you say to stick with a 301-redirect and the &#8220;noindex&#8221; until there total Search Engine support? </p>
<p>Also,  when you are dealing with a huge ecommerce site on different country code domains, what would you personally do for the products as they are identical over four-five sites. The canonical attribute seems like the ideal choice, but if Bing doesn&#8217;t recognize it, will your site be less visible through Bing? </p>
<p>Love to hear your two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/?p=1000545#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>That would be great thanks Kelvin, here is the link - http://www.shoppingcartstrategies.com/interspire/seo-index-module/

It&#039;s a free download for anybody who needs it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be great thanks Kelvin, here is the link &#8211; <a href="http://www.shoppingcartstrategies.com/interspire/seo-index-module/">http://www.shoppingcartstrategies.com/interspire/seo-index-module/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a free download for anybody who needs it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/?p=1000545#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the details of the plugin Dave? I&#039;ll add it to the body of the post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the details of the plugin Dave? I&#8217;ll add it to the body of the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/?p=1000545#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>hi Kelvin

Great article.

I would also like to reinforce your information by saying that I have seen some great results from implementing the canonical URL element. 

After working on a number of Interspire shopping cart installations I was prompted to write a canonical url plug-in that has really helped clean up the search results on the sites using it.

regards Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Kelvin</p>
<p>Great article.</p>
<p>I would also like to reinforce your information by saying that I have seen some great results from implementing the canonical URL element. </p>
<p>After working on a number of Interspire shopping cart installations I was prompted to write a canonical url plug-in that has really helped clean up the search results on the sites using it.</p>
<p>regards Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 8, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2010/01/08/7-reasons-every-e-commerce-manager-should-use-the-rel-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, January 8, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/?p=1000545#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>[...] 7 Reasons Every e-Commerce Manager Should use the Rel Canonical Tag, Site Visibility [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7 Reasons Every e-Commerce Manager Should use the Rel Canonical Tag, Site Visibility [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

